Re: Naming of new lazy versions of existing Phobos functions

[Yota via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 20:35:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, Tourist wrote:

Are you planning to deprecate the non-lazy functions at some (maybe very

distant) point?

No. Phobos has already gone through multiple rounds of renaming/deprecation, all at considerable disruption. Each one was supposed to be "worth it" and the "last time". It needs to stop.

Is an alternate module an option?  std.string.lazy, etc.