Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 23 July 2014 at 18:49:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
I'd say let's leave things as they are. opEquals may need to do 
less work than opCmp, and it often sees intensive use. -- Andrei

You will be the one answering user complaints ;)