"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message news:lrqvfa$2has$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm not saying that is a bad idea or that I don't want to be able to do this. I just prefer this to be handled by a generic serialization module. Which can of course handle the simple cases, like above, as well.
I know, but I don't really care if it's part of a generic serialization library or not. I just want it there. Chances are tying it to a future generic serialization library is going to make it take longer.
