Walter Bright Wrote: > Ary Borenszweig wrote: > > Walter Bright escribió: > >> Ary Borenszweig wrote: > >>> Walter Bright escribió: > >>>> There are a lot of D specific optimization opportunities that are > >>>> left undone for now. > >>> Why? > >> > >> Which of the thousand things people want done in D should be done first? > > > > Those that you feel like doing first. > > > > Ok, you win. :-) > > > > (I use the same reasoning most of the time when coding Descent) > > <g> But I'm not kidding about the thousand things. There are more than > that in Bugzilla.
The core feature set should be more important for now, since they drive D2 closer to a stable specification, and I know how adding new features can break optimizations and whatnot. I would rather see T[new] arrays and working shared qualifiers myself. However, proper ref semantics would also allow us to switch back from C to D syntax for these. Maybe I should get familiar with dmd2's source and see if I can contribute to those issues once I get more free time, but even in its current development state, I have more fun coding in D than I ever had in C or C++.
