On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 09:16:36 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 09:08:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 8/29/14, ponce via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:21:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Dear community, are you ready for this?
Yes! Whatever needs be done.
Yeah destructors are a sore pain when they're unreliable. "May
or may
not be called" is just an awful semantic.
That won't really change though, will it? AFAIK, it'll become:
"will eventually be called at some unspecified point it time.
The program may terminate before that happens, at which point,
the destructor will never be called."
...right?
Yes, there's no way around this with a conservative GC.
