On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 21:31:26 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 22:42:27 UTC, deadalnix
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 16:25:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I had impression that general rule is "most inner scope takes
priority" (with base classes being one "imaginary" scope
above the current one). Are there any actual inconsistencies
you have noticed or it just a matter of lacking matching spec
entry?
There is no inconsistencies because there is no spec.
Maybe in this case it is best to just look at what dmd does and
add that to the spec (assuming what dmd does is sound, and
makes sense).
Yeah this is exactly what I was asking about. I assumed that
deadlnix has done some research about it and found some specific
inconsistencies / issues - after all, it is not the only
implementation-defined feature he must have encountered :)
