On 9/24/2014 2:56 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 06:57:14 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/23/2014 11:24 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 24/09/14 06:31, Walter Bright wrote:
But it is a bit unreasonable to expect
large project maintainers to rebuild and check for bugs every day. It's
why we have a beta test program.
The solution is to make it automatic.
There's no such thing as automatic testing of someone's moving target large
project with another moving compiler target.
It doesn't exist because no one has created it yet :)
I've never heard of a non-trivial project that didn't have constant breakage of
its build system. All kinds of reasons - add a file, forget to add it to the
manifest. Change the file contents, neglect to update dependencies. Add new
dependencies on some script, script fails to run on one configuration. And on
and on.
Heck, the dmd release package build scripts break every single release cycle.
Digger succeeds in building all D versions in the last few years.
It doesn't build a complete package like the packaging scripts,
but the process of just building the compiler and standard
library is fairly stable.
Building of the compiler/library itself is stable because the autotester won't
pass it if they won't build. That isn't the problem - the problem is the package
scripts fail. (This is why I want the package building to be part of the
autotester.)
