On 28/09/2014 23:00, Walter Bright wrote:
I can't get behind the notion of "reasonably certain". I certainly would
not use such techniques in any code that needs to be robust,
On 29/09/2014 04:04, Walter Bright wrote:
> I know I'm hardcore and uncompromising on this issue, but that's where I
> came from (the aviation industry).
Walter, you do understand that not all software has to be robust - in
the critical systems sense - to be quality software? And that in fact,
the majority of software is not critical systems software?...
I was under the impression that D was meant to be a general purpose
language, not a language just for critical systems. Yet, on language
design issues, you keep making a series or arguments and points that
apply *only* to critical systems software.
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
