On 10/1/14 3:24 PM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:46:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/1/14 10:36 AM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
This is a grey area that I think reasonable people
can correctly call a bug if they so wish, despite the intentions of
the developer.
Correctly?
In a discussion, It's amazing how difficult it is to agree also on
simple words meaning: an _intentional programmer behaviour_ a bug?
More appropriately, it's not a bug but an incorrect design. I still
would call it a bug, and I'm 99% sure the users would report it as a bug :)
-Steve
