On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 17:01:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
For a compile-string that's statically fixed (i.e.,
writefln!"..."(...)), we can do a lot more than what ctFmt does. For example, we can parse the format at compile-time to extract individual formatting specifiers and intervening string fragments, and thereby
transform the entire writefln call into a series of puts() and
formattedWrite() calls.

The take home point is that ctFmt would *also* parse the string at compile time. The difference is that it creates a run-time object, which still contains enough static information for a powerful write, yet still some run-time info to be able to swap them at runtime.

Reply via email to