language_fan wrote: (...) > > For what's it worth, I have not seen any firmware projects that use D, > either. Not that it's impossible, no one in the firmware industry just is > not interested in D. When you have limited amount of memory resources, > the bloaty executables that dmd generates (all firmware uses x86 opcodes, > right), the typeinfos, and the garbage collector are a nuisance. >
If you don't mind me asking, what is your interest in D?
