On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 17:27:22 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 12:45:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 07:36:21 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
Wait what? Are you saying there is a single case when this:
const T var;
is not identical to this:
const(T) var;
No, look at the pointer symbol.
module test;
const int** a;
const(int**) b;
The original code you quoted was "const(T)* v;" where the "*"
was *outside* of the parens.
There was no * in my quote, only `const(T)` vs `const T` (with
any compound T)
The fact that const T* means const(T*) does not indicate that
const is a storage class but simply a parsing rule. Walter has
made a statement that there is a const storage class that is
distinct from const qualified. I want example.
