Re: DIP66 - Multiple alias this

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/11/2014 7:23 AM, IgorStepanov wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 00:00:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/10/2014 4:23 PM, IgorStepanov wrote:
On Friday, 10 October 2014 at 22:50:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
must be an error, even if one of C.a() or C.b() might be a "better" match.
This is how things work for template mixins and imports.
So it is.

Good!

The same rule applies for overloading.

I've implemented overloading:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3998/files#diff-17b22eae29e74ce6ec29037438b5031cR2136


Please, tell me, what changes should I make to the DIP as a result of
yesterday's discussions.

At the very least, it should say it resolves ambiguities the same way that 
imports and template mixins do.


And please, tell your opinion about "is" issue:

class A
{
    int i;
    alias i this;
}

class B
{
    int i;
    alias i this;
}

class C
{
    A a;
    B b;
    alias a this;
    alias b this;
}

void foo(T)(T arg) if(is(T : int))
{
    ...
}

foo(C()); //Should it pass or not?

There's a rule with imports that if the same symbol is reachable via multiple 
paths through the imports, that it is not an ambiguity error. Here, the same 
type is reachable through multiple alias this paths, so by analogy it shouldn't 
be an error.