On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 18:08:17 UTC, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d wrote:

Yes, that's correct. I juts wait for next dmd v2.067 to avoid all the 2.066 regressions.

Maybe this worths the pain?...

http://forum.dlang.org/post/543dd28193525_57e33ffa705592b89...@hookshot-fe3-cp1-prd.iad.github.net.mail

2.067 is quite far ahead...

Thanks

Reply via email to