On 10/24/2014 02:16 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 11:01:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 12 October 2014 at 12:06:44 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
What's stopping an interface or class to implement a logging concept?
Same as last time:
Logger[], Logger without a LogLevel not real useful IMO, (new) no
thread safety by default
I don't understand your answer. Do you have a link to your last response.
You can not tell if the Logger will log a message, because you can't
know its LogLevel. It is not thread safe because the interface can't
have an implementation. Therefore the default implementation is not
thread safe.
Well then the concept is that a Logger has some method that returns the
LogLevel (might be a runtime value). Where is the problem? We use this
for empty in ranges for example.
