On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 19:55:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:40:50PM +0000, Freddy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 18:04:30 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
>On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
>Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
>>I've submitted a PR for byPair before, but it was
>>roadblocked by the
>>fact that people demand that it return std.typecons.Tuple,
>>yet we're
>>not allowed to import Phobos in druntime. Other than this IMO
>>nitpicky issue, the code was already all ready to go many
>>moons ago.
>>
>>
>>T
>
>Can byPair be implemented in phobos, or does it need to access
>private/package stuff in druntime?
I don't see why not,It could be put into std.range and accept a
generic associative range(which includes the build-in
associative
array).
And how would it be implemented in a way that is stable across
AA
implementations?
--T
in std.range
----
auto byKeyPair(R)(R r) if(isAssociativeRange!R){
return zip(r.byKey,r.byValue);
}
----
Although it will not be possible for lazy associative ranges
because they don't allow iteration
b.t.w should I add this to by PR?
