Graham St Jack Wrote: > So, what is the design of shared supposed to be then? Its time for Walter > to buy in and tell us where this is all going - I for one am very > confused right now. > > Currently I am working around it by not using synchronized methods (I put > synchronized blocks inside the methods), which is very bad form, but what > else can I do?
You're already more adventurous than I am, my current workaround has been to drop all threading support in my runtime, I'm focusing on different parts of my project that do not require threading for now and I'll piece it together when shared gets closer to a final concept.
