On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 01:52:00 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
sure, this decision will break some code. that's why it will
never be
approved, despite all hype about "safety".
at least leaving this feature "as is" should help C++
programmers to
adopt D. they used to languages that has nothing common with
sanity. ;-)
Yes…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_point
http://dlang.org/expression
D needs a major overhaul:
1. assigns should not be expressions, but statements
2. assign should be a sequence point, not UB.
3. re-allocation should always be explicit in non-library types.
Solves all issues.
