On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 07:33:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-11-04 23:18, deadalnix wrote:Yes, I have yet to implement a check for ctfeability.Cool, perhaps you should not add it :)
My plan is to add the check for CTFE, but at the point in the semantic analysis, not in the JIT part, so it is still possible to run it without the check if wanted from 3rd party code (REPL anyone ?).