On 11/13/2014 7:41 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'm not quite clear; are you suggesting 'scope ref' would be a storage class?
Yes.
(looks like it, but it also affects mangling?)
Only for function types.
Please, consider Marc Schütz's existing proposal. Please, please, don't make scope a storage class.
Got a handy link to it?
I have a lot of other issues with this proposal, but maybe I misunderstand it in principle...?
I have no idea what your other issues are and what they may be based on :-)
