On 11/17/2014 1:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
2. I'm not sure if that is enough to make it work. It is worth investigating. It is gonna be much more limited than what I have in mind.
There was a lot of skepticism initially when I proposed that ref be a storage class rather than a type constructor, but it turned out that the problems were resolvable and the end design was an unqualified win. So I think we can do this - at a minimum we need to exhaust the possibility.
