On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:31:23 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> "bearophile"  wrote in message news:lkcltlokangpzzdzz...@forum.dlang.org...
> 
> > From my experience in coding in D they are far more unlikely than 
> > sign-related bugs of array lengths.
> 
> Here's a simple program to calculate the relative size of two files, that 
> will not work correctly with unsigned lengths.
> 
> module sizediff
> 
> import std.file;
> import std.stdio;
> 
> void main(string[] args)
> {
>     assert(args.length == 3, "Usage: sizediff file1 file2");
>     auto l1 = args[1].read().length;
>     auto l2 = args[2].read().length;
>     writeln("Difference: ", l1 - l2);
> }
> 
> The two ways this can fail (that I want to highlight) are:
> 1. If either file is too large to fit in a size_t the result will (probably) 
> be wrong
> 2. If file2 is bigger than file1 the result will be wrong
> 
> If length was signed, problem 2 would not exist, and problem 1 would be more 
> likely to occur.  I think it's clear that signed lengths would work for more 
> possible realistic inputs.
no, the problem 2 just becomes hidden. while the given code works most
of the time, it is still broken.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to