bearophile wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley:Or you could - I dunno - cache the result of the dynamic cast in a local, since doing multiple dynamic casts is terrible style anyway. Just saying. ;)Yes, most of the optimizations done by the compiler can instead be done by the programmer (but some stupid code can be generated by macros, mixins, etc). Bye, bearophile
But the compiler has no means to determine that the two calls to _d_dynamic_cast will return the same pointer.
