"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:m5p99m$luk$1...@digitalmars.com...
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP69
Despite its length, this is a fairly simple proposal. It adds the missing
semantics for the 'scope' storage class in order to make it possible to
pass a reference to a function without it being possible for it to escape.
This, among other things, makes a ref counting type practical. It also
makes it more practical to use other storage allocation schemes than
garbage collection.
It does not make scope into a type constructor, nor a general
type-annotation system.
It does not provide an ownership system, though it would complement one.
This looks really good. Nice work.
