On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 01:30:35 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hello.

i don't like `size_t`. for many month i avoied using it wherever that was possible, 'cause i feel something wrong with it. and today i found
the soultion!

let's see how other D types are named: `int`, `uint`, `byte` (oh, well,
this name sux), `ulong`. see the pattern? so i decided to rename
`size_t` to `usize`. and you know what? it immidiately started to be familiar. like a thing that was always here, simply dressed in patches.

let's face it: that ugly '_t' is alien to D. this is an ugly leftover from C, and this leftover is nonsence. it will not really help anyone, but it immideately turns D code to badly-looking crap. see for yourself:

  size_t countSomeElements();

and

  usize countSomeElements();

`size_t` looking like an alien here, ruining all the style.

i propose to introduce `usize` and `sptrdiff` along with those '_t'
uglyness, and then slowly migrate all the code to the new names.

yes, this is another "cosmetic issue", but let me tell you that such
"purely cosmetic things" are really important for those who just
starting to learn the language.

it's impossible to write nice D code with `size_t`: we have either alias it each time or use `uint`/`ulong` to make our code looks good.

really, i've seen people who using `uint` instead of `size_t`, 'cause "with size_t my code looks ugly, and i tired of aliasing that shit every time". ah, yep, their code sux for 64 bits, but: "i know that
64-bit size_t is... 64-bit. i'll fix that later, maybe."

uglyness leads to bad code. let's kill `size_t` for good!


p.s. some of you may think that i'm trolling. i can assure you that this post is not trolling, this is just another try to talk about "purely cosmetic issues" and how they hurts the language, especially
for beginners. when beginner see such "pure cosmetic issue", he
starting to think that the whole language is a mess: "hey, this is such easy to fix, but they never bother to... i bet the other parts of the language are even worse." and you know what? it's enough to make such mistake two or three times to make people believe that D is a "dirty and hackish language without clear style". "this is uuuugly" is *the*
*argument*.

I would like if usize wasn't implictly convertable to uint or
ulong

Reply via email to