On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 00:13:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Therefore, a `scope ref` return value can be passed on to the
next function as a `ref` argument. If that function again
returns a reference (even if not explicitly designated as
`scope`), the compiler will treat it as if it were `scope ref`.
No, it understood. It is simply not useful.
So far I tend to agree, unfortunately. Considering all provided
answers and explanations suggested semantics are simply not
powerful enough to be useful even for relatively simple idiomatic
D code and with no clear way of backward compatible improvements
this DIP does not pull own weight.
"Those are not scopes you are looking for"
