Andrei
In Java, "protected"-level protection implies package-level protection
(see e.g.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/javaOO/accesscontrol.html).
Should we copy that behavior in D, or take advantage of the package
keyword and require it as in "package protected"?
- should protected imply package? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should protected imply package? Jeremie Pelletier
- Re: should protected imply package? bearophile
- Re: should protected imply package? Jarrett Billingsley
- Re: should protected imply package? Denis Koroskin
- Re: should protected imply package? Don
- Re: should protected imply package? Max Samukha