On 30 December 2014 at 07:29, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 12/29/14 3:42 PM, Dicebot wrote: > > I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to investigate a new way to express > attributes, but I think no matter what we do, we need to rein in the > explosion of attributes that needs to be put on every function.
The approach is to infer everything, right? The only time you are required to make it explicit is when it's an important detail of your API, and you want to receive compile errors when you violate such explicit request.