On 12/30/14 8:59 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 30/12/2014 02:18, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I'm not sure using numbers to distinguish overloads is a good idea. Such
links would break easily.
Note: that isn't part of Andrei's pull.
Yah, I was surprised when I saw'em.
Using numbers is the only workable way, other schemes would also break
easily, probably moreso. I implemented it so that ditto overloads don't
get a separate number, to avoid some breakage when adding dittos.
Agreed. I think the best solution is to simply group overloads together.
They already do related things in any given module, so consolidating
documentation makes sense anyway.
Andrei
