On 2 January 2015 at 03:06, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 01/01/15 17:16, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> Doxygen supports both @param and \param. > > > Ah yes, I'd forgotten that. It's been a while :-\ > >> It would be really good if doxygen supported D comprehensively. I >> often port C code to D which already has doxygen commentary. I never >> port the doxygen docs to ddoc though. > > > Did you ever try preserving the docs and continuing to use doxygen to > generate them? If so, how did it go? Or is that an outright impossibility?
Doxygen doesn't know about most D-specific concepts stuff. Other language concepts are usually a subset of C/C++, but C++ is really a subset of D. Doxygen needs some new concepts as far as I can tell.