On 1/5/15 11:03 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 06:12:41PM +0000, Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 04:10:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:25:28PM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/4/15 5:07 PM, weaselcat wrote:
Why does reduce! take the seed as its first parameter btw? It >sort
of messes up function chaining.
Mistake. -- Andrei
When are we going to fix this?
T
monarch dodra tried to make a reduce that was backward compatible
while moving the seed but it didn't work out in the end. He was
working on a "fold" which was basically reduce with the arguments
swapped but I'm not sure what happened to it.
Should somebody take over the implementation of "fold"? This is
something that ought to be fixed.
If you could that would be great but please fix groupBy first :o) -- Andrei
