On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 19:18:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/5/15 11:51 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 14:00:13 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I strongly disagree :) inout enables so many things that just
aren't
possible otherwise.
Most recent example:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1079
inout only gets confusing when you start using inout
delegates.
You are arguing that inout is useful. That simply makes it a
useful
disaster :)
I guess you and me have different ideas of what a disaster is :)
-Steve
Nop. Great usefulness makes it almost impossible to get rid of in
its current form.