Ah yeah, supporting w3c standards is probably a sensible move. On 08/01/2015 9:55 am, "via Digitalmars-d" <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 20:57:51 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote: > >> I think it can be interesting to provide some string formats can be >> directly converted into color structures. >> >> For example : >> - plain color names : "red", "blue", "light gray",... >> - hexadecimal : "#FF3CBB", "#FF3CBBAA" (same with alpha) >> - decimal : "255, 158, 200", "255, 158, 200, 170" >> ... >> >> I think to that cause I saw many times tools using pretty close syntax >> for color definitions but with boring variations (generally for the alpha >> position). >> > > It is defined in a w3c standard and refined in a draft, but probably does > not belong in the colour module, but a media-file parser module? > > However, the at least the following colour spaces are mentioned as > supported in w3c documents: > > L*ab, L*CHab, HSL, HWB > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGColorPrimer12/ > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-color/ > >