On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 18:07:55 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 17:57:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Still, #9584 had some discussions about doing lazy stack trace
construction, which was costing most of the time, but I don't
remember if that was actually implemented.
Yea, it was (I did it myself for posix, someone else did it on
Windows), led to gigantic speed boosts, unless you are printing
the trace, of course, when it has to be generated.
Can you elaborate on the technical details of that stunt ? When
you need to build the trace, you often have unwinded part of the
stack, so it does seems hard to build it lazily.
