On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 20:24:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I propose we pull this in today and make it available for 2.067
as std.experimental.logger.
We've been through a number of iterations with this and the
best way to move forward is to accumulate a bit of real-world
experience with it. Since we're deploying to std.experimental
there is understanding breaking changes are still possible.
Dicebot, as the review manager you get to decide. What do you
say?
Andrei
I was in favor of merging it long time ago. It is _your_
defintion of being good enough for std.experimental I am trying
to comply now ;) Merging it right now and continuing with fixes
as follow-up pull requests is a good idea but you must understand
that chance of breaking chance is very high.
That said I have just now tested last version (with thread-local
log support) and apart from one bug found it works as expected.
Assuming you give your LGTM I will merge the PR as soon as this
bug is fixed and PR is rebased/squashed.
