On 1/26/15 12:30 PM, Dicebot wrote:
We couldn't merge it into std.experimental before because you have
stated that even std.experimental modules shouldn't have a breaking
changes normally. It was 2 reviews ago.
Now you have reconsidered, which is understandable considering how long
has it been taking, but pretending that was intended to work that way
does not make you look good :(
PS I was in favor for very lax initial requirements for experimental
packages for this very reason.
Now I remember. I admit I was wrong. -- Andrei
