BCS wrote: [...] > I wouldn't want to hire a programer that *habitually* (and > unnecessarily) hacks past a feature designed to prevent bugs.
In the short time of an interview its not possible to test for habits (or necessarity) to hack past a feature designed to provent bugs. Therefore the only measures of code quality are the number of bugs detected by the users---or the number of WTF's exclaimed during a code review. Are you able to give an upper limit for the number of WTF's during a code review for which the coder is not fired? -manfred
