Wait, is this a reply today to a post made in November 2012? -- Andrei

Yes, here is what happens:

1. person does a search, finds 2+ year old thread that he likes to respond to. 2. Entire thread gets pushed to the "most recent" posts on forum/newsgroup 3. Others now see the thread (possibly for the second time), and don't realize it's old, and read it thinking it's about today.

A nice thing might be to make color of posts on forum.dlang.org based on recentness, 2+ month old be one color, 1+ year be another.

This wouldn't help with newsgroup users, but it probably would help with forum users.

-Steve

Perhaps I should have made clearer in my post, but do you think it is necessarily inappropriate to extend a conversation that petered out rather than making a new post. Many observers (Neil Postman - 'amusing ourselves to death') have pointed to the superficiality and loss of coherence arising from the way in which we use technology.

The question of D's edge and prospects isn't one that changes more than incrementally over a couple of years, as I understand it. And I thought more than a few times before deciding to post as to whether this would add value to the world, but it's an important question and my particular part of finance is not a tiny use domain.

Putting oneself in the position of a prospective new user (as I have to do before suggesting my peers give D a try), one comes away from reading Slashdot discussions with the idea that there are a lot of complaints about D - and then one reads the forums and has a similar perspective. Since people are starved of attention and time, some will give up right then. So I wanted to do my small part to contextualize this.



Laeeth.

Reply via email to