On 4 February 2015 at 15:16, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > "Manu via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message > news:mailman.5867.1423017226.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com... > >> In the inevitable case that I always seem to find myself in, where I'm >> wrapping something in a thin shim that should behave IDENTICAL to the >> thing I'm wrapping. >> It's the source of the vast majority of my language issues. > > > If it's a thin shim, why would you _not_ want it inlined? I guessed you > would say that, but it doesn't seem to be the same as matching arg types and > attributes.
And you have a very fair point. I just have a feeling it's likely to come up, considering my extensive experiences with other similarly awkward features. This is why I'm nowhere near as emotional about this as other issues I have a stake in. I do just want to see resolution.
