Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:27 -0700, Walter Bright thusly wrote: > bearophile wrote: >> This part of the dialogue shows a possible usage for pure (or more >> pure) languages: to correctly implement, avoiding to go mad, very >> tricky transactional algorithms. > > D's scope statement specifically addresses transactional safety.
Indeed, maybe SPJ should just retire as D solves all problems wrt transactions. D2 also has a purely functional subset called SafeD which effectively replaces his modest brainchild, Haskell.
