On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 20:53:48 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 19:38:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 7 February 2015 at 05:27:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/6/15 8:28 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Do you know if D might support that later or if there's a reason for not
supporting it?

It's deliberate following the C++ experience. -- Andrei

Hasn't there been a debate about a hypothetical `opImplicitCast()`? The default would still be off, but you can opt-in by defining said method.

`alias this` is pretty much `opImplicitCast`, but it currently has a few holes, such as http://forum.dlang.org/post/xcnwuneclebuyqcjb...@forum.dlang.org. It's not always appropriate in every situation though, as you get full-on subtyping along with implicit conversion.

No, `alias this` convert from the type it is declared in to another type. `opImplicitCast` would be declared in the destination type.

Reply via email to