On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 04:18:16 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 04:05:35 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/9/15 8:03 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
You could put the 'trusted' template right in object.d, to
save people
the awkward burden of importing it from std.conv all the
time. But that
would be a language change, of sorts.
We won't define it. Instead we'll go with Steve's idea: ()
@trusted => expr. It's not much longer and it's a teensy bit
more awkward - exactly what the doctor prescribed. -- Andrei
People were worried about reliable inlining, but maybe the
compiler can just guarantee that somehow. Aren't we back where
we were before? The only addition we were recommending is the
equivalent of only allowing @trusted lambdas like the one above
in @trusted and @system functions, but not in @safe ones.
Hey, why use '@system' lambdas instead? They are already banned
in @safe code.
