On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 21:25:51 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:00:33PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d > wrote: > > On 2/10/2015 7:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > >Wait, what? I thought that something had to be a Throwable to be > > >throwable or catchable. > > > > Checking the code, I see it now requires Throwable. (D1 required only > > Object.)
Thanks! > I'm sure glad we moved away from that!! Agreed. - Jonathan M Davis
