On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: >> >> But.. you mark something abstract when you want it to be .. abstract. >> How would you argue that abstract is basically a no-op when used on >> methods with bodies? > > It's not a no-op. Try it.
Yeah, not *currently*, but isn't that what you're proposing?
