On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:37:46 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:59:38AM +0000, ketmar via Digitalmars-d > wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:50:55 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> > http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP74 got to reviewable form. Please destroy >> > and discuss. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Andrei >> >> this stinks in the same way as DIP25 stinks. right here: "Attention >> must be paid to annotate all functions returning references to owned >> data with return." this single thing will bring enormous pile of bugs. > [...] > > Wait, are you saying that forgetting the 'return' annotation will still > compile without any warning?? Wow, that's ... not nice. :-(
yep. this is the case for DIP25 too (see RCArray sample: it compiles perfectly fine without `return`).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
