Andrei Alexandrescu, el 3 de octubre a las 12:03 me escribiste: > >So, there we are, you have D, which doesn't support MI per se, you have to > >hack it. You can do it with the nested-inherited-classes+alias-this hack, > >or by using interfaces+mixins. We agree at least that you have the same > >result with both right? Then, I guess is just a matter of taste. I simply > >find much more obscure and complex the nested-inherited-classes+alias-this > >hack than interfaces+mixins :) > > I don't see using a nested class (or any class) with alias this as a > hack. It's the way the whole thing is supposed to work in the first > place.
Ok, then, I just find it ugly and unnecessary since you can do the same with interfaces+mixins. It's just a matter of personal preferences (as I said in my first mail), there is no point on arguing about it. =) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'll take a quiet life, a handshake of carbon monoxide, with no alarms and no surprises, no alarms and no surprises.