On 2/27/15 12:53 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 22:02:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So is the end game of dip25 and dip74 to not have to wrap types you
intend to manage with RC like C++ but just design the classes/structs
themselves around being RCed from the start?
That is correct. Well as shown there are ways to design classes that
work both with RC and GC. -- Andrei
If a class is meant to be refcounted at compile time, what's a
difference from
alias MyClass = RefCounted!MyClassImpl;
// use MyClass instead
except for it introduces an additional check for null and a branch?
The typechecking on RCOs is stricter, which makes them safe. -- Andrei
