On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:01:34 +0000, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: > On Friday, 6 March 2015 at 07:49:51 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> it should be turned inside out: to be productive we need component >> framework a-la BlackBox Component Builder. sadly, most people were >> never worked with *real* component framework, so they keep thinking >> that "ide + >> gui builder + compiler is like component framework". no, no, and no. >> not even close. that loses the main property of component frameworks: >> you aren't writing program using CF, you are simply extending CF until >> it can do what you want. > > Components are coming to HTML5: > > http://jonrimmer.github.io/are-we-componentized-yet/
wow, what a shitload of crap! exactly what i mean when i wrote "most people doing it wrong". > Sure, you can do your own in D, but you probably cannot keep up if this > takes off... It would make a lot more sense to focus on efficient > synchronization between native D arrays and javascript and utilize what > already is there. HTML5 provides ArrayView objects that basically are > slices of raw memory. > > It could work out nicely. but that's crap. it's in no way even near the Component Framework. it's the same old GUI crap, but this time with fancy new name.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature