On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 07:01:02 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 06:56:27 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/10/15 11:52 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I can only urge you to consult with someone deeply involved
with Vibe
(e.g. Sonke), as well as someone who uses Vibe and Dub
heavily in
production, before forcing a decision.
Sönke was up for it last time we communicated. This isn't
forcing any decision as much as pushing things in order toward
a greater goal. -- Andrei
If we want Vibe.d to keep in sync with D, isn't the easiest way
to do that making it part of the standard library as etc.vibe.*
or something?
Simply adding it to auto-tester would achieve the same goal
without introducing awkward library paths.
