On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:09 +0000, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d wrote: […]
> I've never seen Go praised for its error handling, it is always > the opposite. > > Go error handling is verbose and ugly. > http://blog.golang.org/error-handling-and-go Go's mechanism of error handling is for me a horrible regression to 1960's programming. However, the feedback from those who really have "drunk the Kool-Aid" is interesting: the tension between the way of working and number of error in released systems does appear to indicate that they may be getting many fewer errors. However some of the tortuous argumentation about how the coding of error is the right way forward does smack a bit of Stockholm Syndrome. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
